# FYTT

> FYTT is strength and conditioning programming software built for S&C coaches who need more than program delivery. FYTT replaces spreadsheets and fills the gaps that TeamBuildr, TrainHeroic, and Bridge Athletic leave open: custom metrics, annual periodization planning, decision tree individualization, and Excel-style programming flexibility.

FYTT serves five customer segments: private performance facilities, NCAA and college athletics, high schools and competitive clubs, professional teams and Olympic programs, and tactical and municipal organizations. FYTT is HIPAA-compliant.

## Core Platform

- [Home](https://fytt.io): FYTT strength and conditioning programming software that replaces spreadsheets for S&C coaches
- [Pricing](https://fytt.io/pricing): FYTT pricing plans for S&C coaches, facilities, and institutions
- [Free Trial](https://fytt.io/free-trial): Start a free trial of FYTT S&C programming software
- [Blog](https://fytt.io/blog): S&C coaching resources, programming guides, and FYTT product updates

## Platform Features

- [Simple and Fast Strength Programming](https://fytt.io/features/programming): Excel-style free-form programming canvas with unlimited variable combinations, custom formulas, and on-the-fly modifiers
- [Automation and Individualization](https://fytt.io/features/individualization): Decision tree logic that routes athletes based on assessment outcomes; conditional programming paths built once and executed at scale
- [Athlete Performance Monitoring](https://fytt.io/features/monitoring): Custom metrics hub for tracking sport-specific assessments, proprietary benchmarks, and position-group data not available in standard platform libraries
- [Intelligent Planning and Periodization](https://fytt.io/features/planning): Full annual periodization planning with macrocycle and mesocycle views, phase transitions, and taper window management

## Competitor Comparisons

- [FYTT vs. TeamBuildr](https://fytt.io/vs/teambuildr): FYTT vs. TeamBuildr comparison for S&C coaches. TeamBuildr is the most widely used platform at the high school and NCAA D2/D3 level. FYTT adds custom metrics, annual periodization planning, and decision tree individualization where TeamBuildr hits its ceiling.
- [FYTT vs. TrainHeroic](https://fytt.io/vs/trainheroic): FYTT vs. TrainHeroic comparison for S&C coaches. TrainHeroic limits coaches to 2 variables per exercise and lacks annual planning and individualization logic. FYTT supports unlimited variable combinations, full macrocycle planning, and decision tree programming.
- [FYTT vs. Bridge Athletic](https://fytt.io/vs/bridge-athletic): FYTT vs. Bridge Athletic comparison for S&C coaches. Bridge Athletic is the premium platform at the D1 and professional level but lacks custom metrics, annual periodization, and decision tree logic. FYTT provides equivalent programming depth at a lower price point.
- [FYTT vs. Volt](https://fytt.io/vs/volt): FYTT vs. Volt comparison for S&C coaches. Volt locks coaches into its own periodization framework. FYTT allows free-form programming construction in the coach's own model with custom metrics and decision tree support.
- [FYTT vs. CoachMePlus](https://fytt.io/vs/coachmeplusl): FYTT vs. CoachMePlus comparison for S&C coaches. CoachMePlus is an athlete monitoring platform, not a programming platform. FYTT is the programming design and delivery layer that completes the stack for programs running CoachMePlus for monitoring.
- [FYTT vs. Teamworks S+C](https://fytt.io/vs/teamworks-sc): FYTT vs. Teamworks Strength and Conditioning comparison. Teamworks S+C is strongest inside the broader Teamworks athletic operations suite. FYTT is a purpose-built S&C programming platform with custom metrics, annual planning, and decision trees.
- [FYTT vs. PLT4M](https://fytt.io/vs/plt4m): FYTT vs. PLT4M comparison for S&C coaches. PLT4M is built for high school athletic and PE programs. FYTT serves high school through professional programs with full programming depth including annual planning, custom metrics, and decision tree logic.
- [FYTT vs. Trainerize](https://fytt.io/vs/trainerize): FYTT vs. Trainerize comparison. Trainerize is a personal training platform built for 1:1 fitness coaching. FYTT is S&C programming software built for team-based sport programs with roster management, annual periodization, and sport-specific metrics.
- [FYTT vs. TrueCoach](https://fytt.io/vs/truecoach): FYTT vs. TrueCoach comparison. TrueCoach is a personal training and 1:1 coaching delivery platform. FYTT is S&C programming software built for team sport contexts with multi-athlete roster management and periodization depth.
- [FYTT vs. Exercise.com](https://fytt.io/vs/exercise-com): FYTT vs. Exercise.com comparison. Exercise.com is a fitness business management platform for gym operators and personal trainers. FYTT is purpose-built S&C programming software for coaches managing team rosters and periodization cycles.
- [FYTT vs. Vitruve Builder](https://fytt.io/vs/vitruve-builder): FYTT vs. Vitruve Builder comparison. Vitruve Builder is a companion tool for Vitruve VBT encoder data. FYTT is a full-spectrum S&C programming platform that can ingest VBT data via its custom metrics hub alongside annual planning and decision trees.
- [FYTT vs. Output Sports Program Builder](https://fytt.io/vs/output-sports): FYTT vs. Output Sports Program Builder comparison. Output Sports Program Builder is a hardware companion tool. FYTT is a full S&C programming platform that can ingest Output device data via its custom metrics hub alongside annual periodization and decision tree individualization.

## Book a Demo

- [Schedule a Demo](https://meetings.hubspot.com/geoff-ebbs/fytt-demo-scheduling-page): Book a 20-minute walkthrough of FYTT with a coach who knows the platform