Resistance Training for Endurance Athletes Who Want Peak Performance

Most endurance athletes believe that performance comes from more mileage. But strength coach Angelo Gingerelli, New Jersey State Director of the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA), says the real key to peak performance lies in balancing stamina with strength. 

With extensive experience across collegiate athletics and strength and conditioning for adolescent, college, and professional athletes, Gingerelli specializes in training for cross country, swimming, physical education, and personal and athletic performance. He serves as an adjunct professor for multiple graduate and undergraduate programs at Seton Hall University and is the author of Finish Strong: Resistance Training for Endurance Athletes - available on Amazon.

In his presentation for FYTT, Resistance Training for Optimum Endurance, Angelo shares what makes a strong endurance athlete, clears up common misconceptions that hold coaches and athletes back, and outlines practical ways to integrate resistance training into busy training schedules. He also highlights his go-to exercises for runners, swimmers, and cyclists looking to build strength that transfers directly to performance.

When endurance athletes learn to train for strength (not just stamina) they maintain posture, preserve breathing mechanics, reduce overuse injuries, and ultimately compete at a higher level. This conversation breaks down how to integrate resistance training across an annual plan so athletes finish stronger, stay healthier, and perform at their peak.


“Use resistance training to maintain movement quality so athletes look the same at the finish as they did at the start.”

-Angelo Gingerelli


Portrait of Angelo Gingerelli alongside several black weight plates on a dark background, symbolizing strength and conditioning.

Why Strength Belongs in Endurance

Under fatigue, posture degrades, stride shortens, and breathing becomes inefficient. Resistance training gives athletes the capacity to hold posture, expand the ribcage, and maintain mechanics deep into endurance events. Performance improves when athletes focus on structural durability, developing the strength to hold posture and form deep into competition. 

That’s backed by integration strategies from strength science. When adding resistance work, coaches must sequence the training loads of both the resistance and endurance portions of the training plan. Refer to NSCA’s Integration of Endurance Resistance Training article.

And to see how performance capacity evolves across training phases, check FYTT’s Athletic Performance Curve. Pairing that insight with strength work helps manage stress and recovery intelligently.


Four Phases of Strength + Endurance Integration

Unlike team sports such as football, baseball, or basketball where athletes move through well-defined off-seasons, pre-seasons, competitive seasons, and recovery breaks, endurance sports rarely offer that built-in rhythm. Runners, triathletes, and swimmers often train continuously, jumping from one event to the next with little structured downtime. Without natural seasonality, strength work is either neglected or added haphazardly, which limits its long-term benefit.

To solve that, Angelo outlines a four-phase yearly model that applies the same logic used in team sports to the endurance calendar. His example assumes the athlete’s key event is the New York City Marathon in November, but the framework can fit any major race or competition date. The aim is to give athletes clear training priorities across the year, balancing strength, mileage, and recovery so each phase builds toward the next.

Offseason (e.g. Jan-May)

Base Building (June-August)

Peak Mileage (September-mid October)

Taper (Final 3-4 Weeks)

Gingerelli’s framework mirrors modular planning philosophies you’ll find in FYTT’s Decision Trees for High Performance and reflects why shared tools matter as explained in Athlete Management Systems Don’t Manage Anything.


Six Foundational Movement Patterns

Gingerelli builds resistance prescriptions around six core exercises that offer maximum transfer to endurance performance:

To dive deeper into movement anatomy and layering, see FYTT’s Anatomy of Strength and how to individualize progressions in Individualized Fitness: One Size Does Not Fit All.


Weekly Templates That Respect Time & Fatigue

Endurance athletes show up to the weight room already taxed. The programming must work around that reality.

Offseason Example:

During Base/Peak:

During Taper:


“Same movements. Smaller dose. Taper the weight room like you taper the mileage.”


Coaching Tips That Shift Outcomes


Q&A

FYTT: How long does it take before the benefits of resistance training actually show up in an endurance athlete’s performance? When can athletes expect to start noticing those results?

Angelo Gingerelli: Usually 2-3 months. Beginners often respond faster; experienced runners may take longer. 

FYTT: How should nutrition, hydration, and sleep change when adding lifting?

Angelo Gingerelli: Another stress is introduced. Athletes will typically need more calories, more hydration, and more rest. Expect some trial and error in those early weeks as they adapt.

FYTT: When is it appropriate to introduce resistance training for youth athletes?

Angelo Gingerelli: Bodyweight exercises are appropriate in middle school with adequate supervision. Transition to dumbbells/barbells typically occurs in high school when form mastery is solid.

FYTT: How should coaches track mixed training loads over time?

Angelo Gingerelli: Use integrated software tools to log both running and strength. That allows historical comparisons and individualization across seasons.

FYTT: For many coaches, bridging the gap between endurance and strength training can be a cultural challenge, especially when endurance athletes resist the weight room. What advice do you have for coaches trying to integrate resistance training into that environment?

Angelo Gingerelli: Make the weight room accessible. Keep the focus on movement quality, consistency, and incremental gains. Done right, resistance training lets endurance athletes compete at a higher level.


“Stronger endurance athletes keep posture, breathing, and mechanics longer. That’s free speed at the end of a race.”


Endurance athletes don’t need to lift like powerlifters. They need strength that supports their longevity and performance. The right resistance training helps preserve movement, ward off injury, and elevate competition-level output across seasons.


Criterion-Based Groin Rehab: A Coach’s Playbook for Faster RTP

Injuries happen, even to the most prepared athletes. For coaches and performance staff, the challenge goes beyond getting players back on the field. They must be sure the athletes return stronger, more resilient, and less likely to relapse. That’s where criterion-based groin rehab comes in.

This approach was the focus of a recent FYTT-hosted webinar featuring Connor Schoepp, Return to Play Specialist and Owner/Operator of Rebuild Performance & Rehab. With over a decade of experience at the private, collegiate, and professional levels, Connor has specialized in return-to-play, speed development, and applied sport science. His perspective blends clinical precision with performance-driven methods, making his insights valuable for strength and conditioning coaches seeking practical frameworks. 

Instead of relying on outdated timelines or general rehab models, Connor’s framework emphasizes early optimal loading, progressive criteria-driven benchmarks, and collaborative planning between medical, performance, and sport staff. The result: athletes don’t just recover, they come back with a heightened level of preparedness.

This post distills Connor’s approach into practical lessons coaches can apply in their own settings, including principles, progressions, and exit criteria for adductor strains and other groin injuries.

Why Criterion-Based Rehab?

Traditional rehab often leans on rest, passive treatments, and arbitrary timelines. That model can leave athletes detrained and unprepared when they re-enter competition. By contrast, criterion-based groin rehab uses objective tests and progressive loading to guide decisions. Coaches know exactly when an athlete is ready for the next step.

Recent evidence backs this up. A prospective cohort study found that athletes following a criteria-based adductor injury rehab program returned to play in as little as 2-3 weeks for lower-grade strains, with low reinjury rates compared to timeline-only approaches (study link). This underscores the advantage of using clear exit criteria instead of guessing.

Key differentiators of the criterion-based model:

Phase 1: Restore Range and Control

Understanding pathology and management helps frame expectations. According to StatPearls’ review on adductor strains, most injuries respond well to conservative rehab emphasizing early mobility and strengthening, though the clinician must monitor for chronic groin pain or complications like sports hernia.

Phase 2: Rebuild Strength and Movement

Flexibility and mobility should complement these phases. A systematic review notes that while stretching alone shows limited impact on groin pain, integrating targeted mobility with strength progressions improves outcomes (critical review). For coaches, this means mobility drills should supplement -never replace- criteria-based strengthening.


“Every rep in return-to-run should be tracked for pain and perceived effort.”


Phase 3: Reintegrate and Optimize


“Long-term rehab is a rare opportunity to refine skills and set athletes up for the rest of their careers.”


Practical Takeaways for Coaches

For further applied sport science reading, see FYTT resources on the athletic performance curve, individualized training, and ACL rehab lessons


Q&A with Connor Schoepp

FYTT: If you could add only one exercise to help athletes avoid groin injuries, what would it be?

Connor Schoepp: That’s a tough one. I’d say any progressive loading for the groin area that accounts for the sport’s demands. For most athletes, isometrics are key. Copenhagen planks and lying med ball groin squeezes are two of my go-tos. But dosage matters. Some athletes need 3-4 sets a week, while those in congested schedules don’t need more stress added.

FYTT: What about asymmetrical athletes, like throwers?

Connor Schoepp: I’ve worked with baseball players in that situation. The biggest issue isn’t strength, it’s range of motion. The approach is similar - just slow-cook the return-to-throw process. The criteria don’t change much; you just tailor them to the asymmetry.


Groin injuries can be frustrating and complex. But with criterion-based groin rehab, coaches and practitioners have a roadmap that’s scalable, objective, and collaborative. Instead of hoping athletes are ready, you’ll know they are.

Watch Schoepp’s full presentation on YouTube.

Learn how FYTT can help consolidate performance monitoring to streamline return-to-play protocols.

Using Baseline Testing to Drive Early Season Programming in Sports

Why Baseline Testing Is Important

In elite sport, success is built on precision. Nowhere is that more critical than in the transition from off-season to preseason, a period where performance and injury risk are both peaking. For strength and conditioning coaches, sports scientists, athletic trainers, and performance directors, this window demands a level of insight that guesswork can’t deliver. This is where baseline testing becomes essential.

A Foundation for Individualization

At its core, baseline testing establishes the objective starting point for every athlete in your program. Whether they’re returning from injury, coming off a full off-season program, or arriving deconditioned, your athletes enter the building in vastly different states. Testing creates the clarity needed to tailor programming by individual, not assumption.

A vertical jump might reveal a drop in concentric force. Sprint times could show acceleration asymmetries. A groin squeeze test may uncover underlying instability. Together, these markers allow coaches to adjust loading schemes, modify technical drills, or build individualized return-to-play plans.

Without testing, these decisions rely on observation and instinct. With testing, they’re anchored in data. A Science for Sport article on Chelsea FC’s preseason testing strategy outlines how their performance staff assesses neuromuscular fatigue, force asymmetries, and physical readiness on day one.

Aligning Departments Around a Common Language

One of the most overlooked benefits of baseline testing is that it aligns the entire performance department. Each unit of strength & conditioning, sports medicine, sport science, nutrition, and coaching comes with its own language and lens. Baseline testing provides the objective data set that everyone can reference.

Take, for example, a midfielder flagged with below-average aerobic fitness and low neuromuscular power. The S&C coach adjusts conditioning blocks. The nutritionist increases carb intake. The sport scientist tracks fatigue trends. The athletic trainer layers in prehab for prior injury risk. And the head coach tempers early-season workloads. One data point, five actions, all coordinated.

This shared visibility prevents siloed decision-making and elevates the level of care an athlete receives.

Injury Prevention and Athlete Availability

The early preseason period is one of the highest-risk windows for soft tissue injuries. Why? Because athletes are rapidly increasing training volume and intensity after a relative off-season, often without sufficient load monitoring. Baseline testing helps mitigate this spike by identifying red flags before they turn into injuries.

As Catapult notes in their “Four Elements of Preseason Success,” establishing an evidence-based starting point is critical for injury risk management and session design. Similarly, VALD emphasizes that the early weeks of preseason present an ideal window to track fatigue and performance adaptations to ensure appropriate exposure.

Performance Optimization

Baseline testing isn’t just about injury prevention; it’s also the launching point for performance enhancement. By understanding each athlete’s unique profile, you can tailor blocks that develop the right qualities at the right time.

For example:

These aren’t guesses. They’re strategic decisions based on real-world data.

Return-to-Play Calibration

For athletes returning from injury, baseline testing serves as both a starting point and a benchmark. By comparing current outputs to historical norms or to positional averages, staff can determine readiness and progressions more confidently.

This isn’t limited to elite pro settings. Even at the college and high school levels, using simple testing like jump asymmetry or groin squeeze data allows you to remove guesswork from RTP and protect athletes from reinjury.

“Athletic development is complex. Baseline testing should be a meaningful first step that organizes and clarifies variables, identifies rate-limiters, and moves the needle on performance.”

—Geoffrey Ebbs, Northeastern University

Case Study: University of Nebraska

When Hayden Jones, Assistant Strength Coach at the University of Nebraska, relied on spreadsheets, baseline testing data often sat unused because applying it to programming was too time-consuming. FYTT changed that by automating athlete grouping based on test metrics like jump performance, range of motion, and strength assessments. This automation let Hayden instantly modify workouts for clusters of athletes, streamline recovery and RTP adjustments, and communicate insights clearly to sport coaches. The result: faster, more efficient programming, higher athlete engagement, and the ability to use testing data to drive real-time training decisions — all while freeing up time to focus on research, strategy, and long-term athlete development.


Baseline Testing Best Practices

If Section 1 explains why baseline testing matters, this section outlines how to execute it with precision, consistency, and impact. Testing is only as valuable as the decisions it influences, and decisions are only as strong as the data they’re based on. That’s why planning, execution, and alignment are critical.

Ask First: What Will This Test Tell Us?

Before choosing any metric, your staff should collectively answer one question:

What do we want to learn and what action will we take with this data?

Many teams test too much and apply too little. A 40-metric battery won’t help if no one is using the information. The key is to align tests with actionable outputs.

Here’s a simplified decision tree:

If the answer is “no,” drop the test. If “yes,” keep it and define exactly how it will be used.

Build a Core Testing Battery

The best programs develop repeatable, efficient testing systems centered on the sport’s demands and the staff’s capacity. Here’s a modern, scalable example:

CategoryTestPurposeDecisions Driven
PowerCMJ w/ force plateConcentric force, RFD, fatigueLoading intensity, block assignment
Speed10m, 20m sprint (timing gates)Acceleration profileSprint tech, resisted runs, velocity
StabilityGroin Squeeze, IMTPIsometric force, asymmetryRTP criteria, prehab, restrictions
ConditioningYoYo IRT or 30-15 IFTEnergy system readinessTempo vs. repeat sprint exposure
SubjectiveWellness survey + sorenessReadiness, fatigue, sleep, stressDaily adjustments, deload calls
Body CompSkinfolds or DXALean mass, hydration, body fat %Nutrition, energy availability

This battery can be completed in 60–90 minutes for a full squad when split across stations.

Execution: How to Run an Elite Test Day

Testing should feel seamless, not like a disruption to training. A typical setup:

Before Arrival:

During Testing:

After Testing:

Kinexon emphasizes that good test execution isn’t about tech; it’s about reducing lag time between insight and application. That starts with execution discipline.

Standardize Everything

Consistency is king. You can’t compare sprint data across time if one session is on turf at 6 a.m. and the next is on wet grass at 2 p.m.

Standardize:

The more repeatable your test environment, the more meaningful your trends.

“What I’m able to provide to my team is on a whole different level now. I can actually apply research and use my testing data instead of just collecting it. FYTT has truly changed the way I operate.”
— Hayden Jones, University of Nebraska

Timing & Frequency

Baseline testing isn’t a one-off. It should be part of a strategic calendar:

PhasePurposeTiming
PreseasonEstablish baselinesWeek 0–1
Early seasonAdaptation check-inWeek 3–4
Mid-seasonRegression/fatigue auditWeek 8–10
RTP/ReturnCompare results to baseline benchmarksPrior to reintegration

Some tests (like CMJ or wellness) can be repeated weekly for micro-trend monitoring. Others (like sprint or aerobic capacity) can be spaced monthly or quarterly.

Simplifaster advises that frequent, low-burden testing is better than occasional high-burden testing. CMJ takes 10 seconds. Why not use it weekly?


Athlete Engagement

Testing only works if the athlete engages. Give them:

When athletes understand the “why” behind testing, both their effort and your data quality improves.

Integrating With Technology

The final pillar of testing success is integration. Your results should feed directly into:

Tools like FYTT allow you to assign color-coded readiness statuses, auto-generate individualized plans, and share real-time dashboards across S&C, ATC, and coaching staff. This is where testing stops being information and starts being action.


How to Bring Your Performance Staff Together for Programming

Even the best baseline testing protocols mean little if they don’t lead to unified action. The real power of testing lies in how it connects your entire performance department: strength and conditioning, sports science, athletic training, nutrition, and coaching. The goal should be to have a complementary performance plan for the athlete with shared insight and collective purpose.

Here’s how to operationalize that collaboration.

Start With a Shared Dashboard

Once testing is complete, upload all results into a centralized system accessible to every department. Whether you use FYTT or another athlete management tool, this dashboard should include:

This shared source of truth eliminates miscommunication and empowers every staff member to plan interventions in alignment.

Strength & Conditioning: From Test to Block

The S&C coach is often the first to act on test data. Here’s how to structure programming from day one:

Example:

A college football athlete shows strong strength numbers but poor jump stiffness and YoYo endurance. Week 1 includes eccentric overload in the weight room and tempo intervals twice weekly — with no sprint exposure until week 2.

Sports Medicine & Athletic Trainers: Program for Prevention and RTP

Testing gives ATCs a roadmap for both prehab and reintegration. Use testing to:

Example:

A basketball player returning from hamstring strain shows acceptable sprint splits but lingering asymmetry in force plate CMJ. The ATC collaborates with S&C to delay max-effort sprint exposure until symmetry improves.

Sport Science: Load Management and Longitudinal Monitoring

The sport science team’s role is to monitor adaptations, not just collect data.

Use testing to:

Example:

By week 3 of preseason, four athletes show CMJ regressions and increased wellness fatigue scores. The sport scientist recommends a reduced lift volume and lighter field session for that cluster.

Nutrition: Fueling Programming, Not Just the Athlete

Nutritionists can use testing to inform:

Example:

After testing, three soccer players are flagged for low YoYo output and underweight status. The nutritionist provides customized recovery meals and monitors post-test energy availability.

Coaching Staff: Training Design and Strategic Planning

From head coach to technical assistants, the entire coaching staff must understand how test results affect early season programming.

Use testing to:

Example:

After testing reveals neuromuscular fatigue in 30% of the squad, the head coach modifies training intensity, shifts to technical work, and reduces scrimmage length for the week.

Weekly Integration Meetings

Best-in-class programs hold weekly interdisciplinary meetings to review:

This keeps all departments proactive and synchronized.

Final Word

Baseline testing doesn’t live in a spreadsheet. It lives in decisions.

When departments work together from a shared data set, early season programming becomes safer, smarter, and more individualized, which is exactly what elite sport demands.

Breaking Down Silos in Soccer: A Conversation with Rob Gale, Head Coach of the Portland Thorns

Originally recorded as part of FYTT’s Soccer High Performance Webinar Series

🎥 Watch the full webinar

When Rob Gale stepped into the interim head coach role at the Portland Thorns just four matches into the 2023 NWSL season, he inherited not only a team but a complex ecosystem of performance departments. With over 20 years in professional football—including stints with Canada’s men’s national teams and NYCFC’s academy—Gale brought a collaborative, results-driven approach to managing the many moving pieces of elite sport.

In this interview-style recap of FYTT’s high-performance webinar, Rob shares how he leads across departments, structures training environments, and defines what true “availability” means in elite soccer.

FYTT: You’ve coached at nearly every level—from national teams to youth academies. What’s changed the most over the years?

Rob Gale: The game has gotten more complex. As a head coach now, you're not just managing the technical piece—you’re managing the entire performance ecosystem. Medical, sport science, administration, logistics, equipment—you have to coordinate all of it. And ultimately, the buck stops with you.

FYTT: You said the technical department is where you spend most of your energy. What’s your approach there?

Gale: Vision and clarity. I use a model I originally built at Valor FC that outlines our game model across four moments—attacking organization, attacking transition, defensive organization, and defensive transition. Each moment has two or three clear principles and match cues. We print this and post it in the locker room.

Our staff is small—just two assistants, a goalkeeper coach, and an analyst—so it’s critical that we all work off the same blueprint. Everyone owns a piece of the daily session. It’s not micromanaged, but it’s coordinated with clarity.

FYTT: How do you ensure the team is physically peaking on game day?

Gale: Periodization drives everything. We map out the entire month—recovery days, technical vs. tactical sessions, gym top-ups, travel, matchdays—then refine it weekly.

Each day includes a 7:30 a.m. staff meeting to align, then an 11:00 a.m. pitch session. Our sport science and medical teams provide player availability every morning, including what percent of the session each player can handle. That drives how we plan both the collective and the individual workloads.

FYTT: Speaking of availability, you redefined what that means at Portland. Can you explain?

Gale: When I arrived, there were vague ranges like “15 to 30 minutes available.” That doesn’t help me win games. Now, if you’re not available for at least 45 minutes, you’re not considered “available.” For starters, I expect 60 minutes minimum. I don’t want to be forced into a substitution unless it’s tactical.

That clarity helps my medical and performance teams build return-to-play protocols that match tactical demands.

FYTT: What’s the role of the equipment and admin staff in a professional environment?

Gale: Massive. We post field maps each day, so the equipment manager can lay everything out in advance. Between drills, they help clear setups and reset for the next phase. That keeps the session intense and fluid—just like match day.

Our admin team handles visas, housing, vehicles, social security numbers—everything a player needs to perform off the field. I always say: “How we exit a player matters just as much as how we welcome them.” A poorly handled trade or release hurts your reputation in the locker room and across the league.

FYTT: What does good collaboration look like between sport science and coaching?

Gale: No silos. We’ve built one shared Excel file that everyone can access—sport science, medical, technical, admin. That file drives daily decision-making.

We track GPS, high-speed runs, meters per minute, accelerations, decelerations—everything. But we don’t use data in a vacuum. My sport scientists know that performance pays our bills. So we blend science with the realities of the game. If Sophia Smith wants extra finishing, we find a way to support her without overloading.

FYTT: Any advice for young sport scientists trying to break into elite teams?

Gale: Don’t just quote numbers. Understand context. Support the coach’s plan. Learn what “availability” means in performance terms—not just medical clearance. Be a partner, not a roadblock.

FYTT: You’ve referred to substitutes as “finishers.” Why?

Gale: Language shapes identity. Calling them “subs” implies they're not first-choice. But when we’re missing nine players to international duty, those next players become starters. “Finishers” implies purpose—you're not just replacing someone; you're entering to win the match.

FYTT: Final thoughts?

Gale: Elite performance isn’t just about drills and tactics—it’s about clarity, communication, and culture. Break down silos. Respect every role. And remember: every department contributes to winning.

💡 FYTT Takeaway

Rob Gale’s approach embodies FYTT’s mission: integrating technical, medical, and performance staff into one cohesive unit. With clear planning, shared language, and a culture of collaboration, coaches can elevate both performance and player wellbeing.

Learn more about how FYTT powers high-performance teams → Free Trial

Female-Specific Training: Creating Equity in Athlete Care

Of the 113 medals awarded to the U.S. in the 2021 Olympic Games, 66 were won by women (58%). Despite this incredible accomplishment, female representation and female-specific training in sports is still far from perfect. Women make up half the world's population, and they continue to make great strides in sports performance. Yet female-specific training remains a niche endeavor in athlete management.

What’s holding female-specific training back? Common barriers include:

As the U.S. women’s overwhelming success in Tokyo indicates, there has never been a better time to invest in female athletes. In her recent webinar, sport scientist Sam Moore argues that creating an equitable training environment doesn’t mean offering women the same training as men. Instead, the key to equitable athlete management is to offer a training environment that’s specifically suited to women and their unique physiology. 

WATCH THE WEBINAR

Learn about challenges facing women in sports and how to provide more equitable care for female athletes, specifically the concept of Menstrual Cycle-Based Training (MCBT).

WATCH NOW

Moore argues that a better understanding of best practices for strength and conditioning programs for the modern female athlete starts with more comprehensive education. Most women are never taught how their physiology — primarily related to the menstrual cycle — impacts their performance. The “intersection of gender equity” in sports, Moore says, can “revolutionize the training and treatment of women athletes at every [level].” 

Common roadblocks for female athletes

To broach the subject of creating equity for female athletes, it’s important to define the terms surrounding it. In her webinar, Moore defines the term “woman” as referencing gender identity, which may exist fluidly or on a spectrum. She references The Trevor Project’s glossary definition of gender identity: “Our internal understanding and experience of our own gender.”

The term female is referencing biological sex, which can be attributed to several variables. Moore acknowledges that while binary classifications of male and female don’t effectively contain the modern population — “Not all women athletes menstruate, and not all athletes who menstruate are women” — the terms help to remain consistent with current research. 

Entering the discussion about women and female athletes as defined in modern studies, there are several common roadblocks to providing female-specific care.

Discomfort

It can be uncomfortable to talk about the realities of female-specific training. With much of the conversation rooted in topics of physical processes like menstruation and ovulation and the symptoms that come with them, female athlete management can feel like a tricky topic for trainers and coaches — especially male coaches. 

Moore insists that the best way to overcome this roadblock is to tackle it head on. “I encourage you to sit with it, understand why you feel that way and how it doesn't serve you in order to dismantle the bias. Then move forward past it,” Moore says.

Recently, La Trobe University published a study centered on the challenges of training female athletes. The male subjects of the study, 18 elite soccer coaches, shared their lack of confidence in their knowledge of the menstrual cycle and the way it impacts the athletes. More importantly, they emphasized their discomfort with bringing up the subject with their peers and students. 

While the study pointed to a glaring discomfort with the unknown, it also brought to light an encouraging desire among modern male coaches to learn more.

Lack of knowledge

The insufficiency of understanding around female-specific training reaches far beyond male coaches and peers. It’s also true of female athletes themselves, who are rarely taught about how their unique physiology can have a major effect on their performance and training.

Moore says that the menstrual cycle and training are simply not talked about together. Even throughout graduate school, she recalls understanding her cycle only as it related to reproduction — not her athletic abilities. The solution is to start educating female athletes early so that they can move upward in their careers with a healthy understanding and appreciation of their bodies. 

Stigma surrounding female biology

When it comes to women in the sports world, one of the most glaring roadblocks is the stigma surrounding female biology. In 2020, The Rally Report indicated that one in every three girls stops playing sports before the age of 15. This disheartening statistic was attributed to a number of factors:

Moore points to the overwhelming pressure that young female athletes face as they shoulder societal gender roles in a competitive environment. Female athletes are more likely to experience disordered eating than their non-athlete female and athlete male peers. Young women often report a desire to remove themselves from the athletic environment, where they’re constantly comparing themselves to the other women around them. 

These pain points grow more prevalent as girls reach puberty and beyond, with the feeling being most pronounced among the surveyed girls between the ages of 16 and 18. 

How the menstrual cycle impacts strength & conditioning

There is perhaps no greater conflict between female physiology and athletic training than the one that exists between the menstrual cycle and strength and conditioning. In her webinar, Moore discusses the menstrual cycle in its entirety — as “a cyclical and constant fluctuation of hormones.”

Moore addresses multiple key points about a woman’s cycle and her athletic life.

Phases in the menstrual cycle

As you learned in middle and high school, the menstrual cycle is the process by which a woman's body prepares for the possibility of pregnancy each month. The menstrual cycle lasts between 20 and 30 days and is made up of two phases:

While many people are aware of the menstrual cycle's existence and its overall purpose, far fewer are attuned to the way it impacts daily health — from mental health to energy levels to cognitive functions.

Impact on mental health

For many women, certain parts of the menstrual cycle can create significant changes in mood and mental health. “It's not a matter of toughness,” Moore reiterates. Hormonal fluctuations often cause instability in mood, which can have a major impact on an athlete’s confidence. Many female athletes battle feelings of anxiety and depression in the midst of their cycle. Variations in hormone levels can make it challenging for athletes to effectively communicate their feelings. 

Not all effects are as severe. For example, in the early luteal phase, some women may experience mild brain fog and fatigue, while others may need to slow down significantly. 

Effect on energy levels

During a female athlete’s period, she may experience a severe depletion in her energy levels. Accompanying effects include the following:

In short, many women suffer from a significant dip in energy, “fuel access,” and various strengths throughout their cycle. It’s important that trainers learn about and acknowledge this very real phenomenon in female athletes. 

Moore argues that tailoring training programs to the menstrual cycle and its effects maximizes a female athlete’s potential and makes her feel more valued, rather than offering a timeout during her cycle — as common misconceptions suggest. 

Overcoming roadblocks for the female athlete

It’s clear that female athletes face a unique challenge when balancing their menstrual cycle and training programs. So what can you do about it? Moore addresses several ways to elevate the female athlete’s strength and conditioning experience.

Tracking the menstrual cycle

The fluctuation of hormones from stage to stage can create a truly wide range of symptoms from person to person. This, Moore argues, is why it’s imperative that female athletes track their cycles.

One of the most common responses she has received from the athletes she’s worked with is, “Oh, I didn't track that symptom because it's not related to my period.” However, Moore emphasizes that the opposite is true: “Everything is related to your period.”

Because of this, it’s essential that female athletes make note of the symptoms they experience — and understand that these changes are not simply in their head. Tracking symptoms can help athletes better understand their cycle and the way it uniquely affects their performance

As a coach, it’s up to you to create a safe space and system for tracking your athletes' cycles. Moore suggests surveying athletes daily. Instead of asking, “When did you start your last period?” she recommends asking, “Did you start your period today?” The simplified, consistent format eliminates errors in tracking. She also recommends tracking sleep time and quality. 

Planning parallel to the menstrual cycle

Creating a training program that tailors its progression to the female menstrual cycle can maximize the athlete’s efficiency and progress. You can amass the most benefit for your athletes by dividing your program into two phases that run parallel to the menstrual cycle:

Follicular phase

The follicular phase is characterized by an increase in estrogen, steady testosterone, and decreasing progesterone. In this phase, Moore suggests focusing on:

Ultimately, in this anabolic-focused time period, Moore recommends “max testing of your power.” Thinking of estrogen as building blocks that collect over time, training during the follicular phase should ramp up from the end of the menstrual period and onward. 

Luteal phase

The luteal phase is characterized by fluctuating estrogen, peak progesterone, and unstable testosterone. During the dips in energy of the luteal phase, Moore recommends dialing back training. Pushing over-fatigued or under-motivated athletes can lead to injury. Female athletes can anticipate these drastic drops in energy directly after ovulation. 

On the other hand, women often experience training maximums in the two days leading up to ovulation. During high-energy times, Moore recommends focusing on functional movement, working on new skills, and engaging in aerobic workouts. The luteal phase is often the perfect time to home in on reteaching or honing specific movements or skills. 

Ultimately, a woman's cycle is characterized by peaks and valleys of energy — some intense and some mild. As a trainer, it’s up to you to truly listen to your athlete and craft a strength and conditioning program that aligns with their physiology.

Moving forward: Making female-specific training the standard

Despite its obvious importance, female-specific training remains novel in the sports world — not unlike equity. “But women are not niche,” Moore says. “They are the majority, and the dominant athletic majority at that.” In her webinar, Moore brings up several tips for creating a space that nurtures female-specific training:

Addressing past shortcomings

One of the most important points Moore brings up is the importance of addressing past misunderstandings and transgressions in order to move forward. 

“It’s OK if you said that you're more likely to tear your ACL on your period because that's genuinely what you were taught,” she says, as long as you acknowledge that you were wrong. The next step is making an open, tangible effort to continue your education. 

Being vulnerable and approachable

It’s essential that leaders in sports not only take steps to grow but also take them in front of their student athletes. Coaches and trainers must demonstrate a certain level of approachability and vulnerability to gain the trust of their female athletes. This process may start by admitting to past errors, but it continues with consistent openness.  

To open the door to constructive conversations about female physiology and training, you should start with the following:

Holding athletes accountable

Moore advocates for holding female athletes accountable for their potential through education. While all athletes should maintain the option to opt out of surveys, effective athlete management includes educating women about the importance of tracking and communicating their symptoms. They should understand that while they’ll still receive quality training regardless, their experience will only be elevated by looping their coaches into their status. 

Creating a sense of empowerment

The bottom line is that women and girls are empowered by understanding their cycle and how to train in a way that aligns with their physiological state. 

“They came here to play their sport and to grow as a human,” Moore emphasizes, “and our job is to make sure that they are informed and empowered — and they're equipped so that when they leave the weight room and they go out into the world, they know who they are and they know what they deserve, and they feel ready to handle the situations that life throws at them.”